[ITEM]
Pdf Performance Complexity Analysis For Mac Rating: 5,0/5 5650 votes

Abstract: This work explores the rate-reliability-complexity limits of the quasi-static K-user multiple access channel (MAC), with or without. Panies in traversing the complexity and performance tradeoff when building their own local ML systems. Third, we want to understand which key knobs have the biggest impact on performance, and try to design generalized techniques to optimize those knobs. Our analysis produces a number of interesting findings.

Introduction

Algorithmic complexity is concerned about how fast or slow particular algorithm performs. We define complexity as a numerical function T(n) - time versus the input size n. We want to define time taken by an algorithm without depending on the implementation details. But you agree that T(n) does depend on the implementation! A given algorithm will take different amounts of time on the same inputs depending on such factors as: processor speed; instruction set, disk speed, brand of compiler and etc. The way around is to estimate efficiency of each algorithm asymptotically. We will measure time T(n) as the number of elementary 'steps' (defined in any way), provided each such step takes constant time.

Let us consider two classical examples: addition of two integers. We will add two integers digit by digit (or bit by bit), and this will define a 'step' in our computational model. Therefore, we say that addition of two n-bit integers takes n steps. Consequently, the total computational time is T(n) = c * n, where c is time taken by addition of two bits. On different computers, additon of two bits might take different time, say c1 and c2, thus the additon of two n-bit integers takes T(n) = c1 * n and T(n) = c2* n respectively. This shows that different machines result in different slopes, but time T(n) grows linearly as input size increases.

The process of abstracting away details and determining the rate of resource usage in terms of the input size is one of the fundamental ideas in computer science.

Asymptotic Notations

The goal of computational complexity is to classify algorithms according to their performances. We will represent the time function T(n) using the 'big-O' notation to express an algorithm runtime complexity. For example, the following statement

T(n) = O(n2)
says that an algorithm has a quadratic time complexity.

Definition of 'big Oh'

For any monotonic functions f(n) and g(n) from the positive integers to the positive integers, we say that f(n) = O(g(n)) when there exist constants c > 0 and n0 > 0 such that
f(n) ≤ c * g(n), for all n ≥ n0

Intuitively, this means that function f(n) does not grow faster than g(n), or that function g(n) is an upper bound for f(n), for all sufficiently large n→∞

Here is a graphic representation of f(n) = O(g(n)) relation:

Examples:

  • 1 = O(n)
  • n = O(n2)
  • log(n) = O(n)
  • 2 n + 1 = O(n)

The 'big-O' notation is not symmetric: n = O(n2) but n2 ≠ O(n).

Exercise. Let us prove n2 + 2 n + 1 = O(n2). We must find such c and n0 that n 2 + 2 n + 1 ≤ c*n2. Let n0=1, then for n ≥ 1

1 + 2 n + n2 ≤ n + 2 n + n2 ≤ n2 + 2 n2 + n 2 = 4 n2
Therefore, c = 4.

Constant Time: O(1)

An algorithm is said to run in constant time if it requires the same amount of time regardless of the input size. Examples:

  • array: accessing any element
  • fixed-size stack: push and pop methods
  • fixed-size queue: enqueue and dequeue methods

Linear Time: O(n)

An algorithm is said to run in linear time if its time execution is directly proportional to the input size, i.e. time grows linearly as input size increases. Examples:

  • array: linear search, traversing, find minimum
  • ArrayList: contains method
  • queue: contains method

Logarithmic Time: O(log n)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to the logarithm of the input size. Example:

  • binary search

Recall the 'twenty questions' game - the task is to guess the value of a hidden number in an interval. Each time you make a guess, you are told whether your guess iss too high or too low. Twenty questions game imploies a strategy that uses your guess number to halve the interval size. This is an example of the general problem-solving method known as binary search:

locate the element a in a sorted (in ascending order) array by first comparing a with the middle element and then (if they are not equal) dividing the array into two subarrays; if a is less than the middle element you repeat the whole procedure in the left subarray, otherwise - in the right subarray. The procedure repeats until a is found or subarray is a zero dimension.

Note, log(n) < n, when n→∞. Algorithms that run in O(log n) does not use the whole input.

Quadratic Time: O(n2)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to the square of the input size. Examples:

  • bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort

Definition of 'big Omega'

We need the notation for the lower bound. A capital omega Ω notation is used in this case. We say that f(n) = Ω(g(n)) when there exist constant c that f(n) ≥ c*g(n) for for all sufficiently large n. Examples
  • n = Ω(1)
  • n2 = Ω(n)
  • n2 = Ω(n log(n))
  • 2 n + 1 = O(n)

Definition of 'big Theta'

To measure the complexity of a particular algorithm, means to find the upper and lower bounds. A new notation is used in this case. We say that f(n) = Θ(g(n)) if and only f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = Ω(g(n)). Examples
  • 2 n = Θ(n)
  • n2 + 2 n + 1 = Θ( n2)

Analysis of Algorithms

The term analysis of algorithms is used to describe approaches to the study of the performance of algorithms. In this course we will perform the following types of analysis:
  • the worst-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by the maximum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the best-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by the minimum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the average case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by an average number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the amortized runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by a sequence of operations applied to the input of size a and averaged over time.
Example. Let us consider an algorithm of sequential searching in an array.of size n.
Its worst-case runtime complexity is O(n)
Its best-case runtime complexity is O(1)
Its average case runtime complexity is O(n/2)=O(n)

Amortized Time Complexity

Consider a dynamic array stack. In this model push() will double up the array size if there is no enough space. Since copying arrays cannot be performed in constant time, we say that push is also cannot be done in constant time. In this section, we will show that push() takes amortized constant time.

Let us count the number of copying operations needed to do a sequence of pushes.

push()copyold array sizenew array size
1 0 1 -
2 1 1 2
3 2 2 4
4 0 4 -
5 4 4 8
6 0 8 -
7 0 8 -
8 0 8 -
9 8 8 16

We see that 3 pushes requires 2 + 1 = 3 copies.

We see that 5 pushes requires 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 copies.

We see that 9 pushes requires 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 15 copies.

In general, 2n+1 pushes requires 2n + 2n-1+ .. + 2 + 1 = 2n+1 - 1 copies.

Asymptotically speaking, the number of copies is about the same as the number of pushes.

We say that the algorithm runs at amortized constant time.

Victor S.Adamchik, CMU, 2009

Contents.Versions and key features FileVault was introduced with (10.3), and could only be applied to a user's home directory, not the startup volume. The uses an encrypted (a large single file) to present a volume for the home directory.

And use more modern which spread the data over 8 MB files (called bands) within a bundle. Apple refers to this original iteration of FileVault as legacy FileVault.(2011) and newer offer FileVault 2, which is a significant redesign.

This encrypts the entire OS X startup volume and typically includes the home directory, abandoning the disk image approach. For this approach to, authorised users' information is loaded from a separate non-encrypted boot volume (partition/slice type AppleBoot).FileVault The original version of FileVault was added in Mac OS X Panther to encrypt a user's home directory.Master passwords and recovery keys When FileVault is enabled the system invites the user to create a master password for the computer. Apple Press Info. June 23, 2003. Retrieved January 21, 2013. Configure l2tp vpn mikrotik. ScottW (November 5, 2007).

Archived from on October 29, 2013. Retrieved January 21, 2013. ^ Apple Inc (August 9, 2012).

Retrieved September 5, 2012. Apple Inc (August 17, 2012).

Archived from (PDF) on August 22, 2017. Retrieved September 5, 2012.

Apple support. Retrieved January 21, 2013.

CrashPlan PROe support. CrashPlan PROe. Retrieved January 21, 2013. CrashPlan support. Retrieved January 21, 2013., Ralf-Philipp Weinmann (December 29, 2006). Retrieved March 31, 2007. Cite journal requires journal=.; et al.

(February 2008). Archived from (PDF) on May 14, 2008. Cite journal requires journal=.

(PDF). ^ Apple, Inc (August 17, 2012). Archived from (PDF) on August 22, 2017.

Retrieved September 5, 2012. Dworkin, Morris (January 2010). NIST Special Publication (800–3E). Choudary, Omar; Felix Grobert; Joachim Metz (July 2012). Retrieved January 19, 2013.

Cite journal requires journal=. August 21, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2014.

[/ITEM]
[/MAIN]
Pdf Performance Complexity Analysis For Mac Rating: 5,0/5 5650 votes

Abstract: This work explores the rate-reliability-complexity limits of the quasi-static K-user multiple access channel (MAC), with or without. Panies in traversing the complexity and performance tradeoff when building their own local ML systems. Third, we want to understand which key knobs have the biggest impact on performance, and try to design generalized techniques to optimize those knobs. Our analysis produces a number of interesting findings.

Introduction

Algorithmic complexity is concerned about how fast or slow particular algorithm performs. We define complexity as a numerical function T(n) - time versus the input size n. We want to define time taken by an algorithm without depending on the implementation details. But you agree that T(n) does depend on the implementation! A given algorithm will take different amounts of time on the same inputs depending on such factors as: processor speed; instruction set, disk speed, brand of compiler and etc. The way around is to estimate efficiency of each algorithm asymptotically. We will measure time T(n) as the number of elementary 'steps' (defined in any way), provided each such step takes constant time.

Let us consider two classical examples: addition of two integers. We will add two integers digit by digit (or bit by bit), and this will define a 'step' in our computational model. Therefore, we say that addition of two n-bit integers takes n steps. Consequently, the total computational time is T(n) = c * n, where c is time taken by addition of two bits. On different computers, additon of two bits might take different time, say c1 and c2, thus the additon of two n-bit integers takes T(n) = c1 * n and T(n) = c2* n respectively. This shows that different machines result in different slopes, but time T(n) grows linearly as input size increases.

The process of abstracting away details and determining the rate of resource usage in terms of the input size is one of the fundamental ideas in computer science.

Asymptotic Notations

The goal of computational complexity is to classify algorithms according to their performances. We will represent the time function T(n) using the 'big-O' notation to express an algorithm runtime complexity. For example, the following statement

T(n) = O(n2)
says that an algorithm has a quadratic time complexity.

Definition of 'big Oh'

For any monotonic functions f(n) and g(n) from the positive integers to the positive integers, we say that f(n) = O(g(n)) when there exist constants c > 0 and n0 > 0 such that
f(n) ≤ c * g(n), for all n ≥ n0

Intuitively, this means that function f(n) does not grow faster than g(n), or that function g(n) is an upper bound for f(n), for all sufficiently large n→∞

Here is a graphic representation of f(n) = O(g(n)) relation:

Examples:

  • 1 = O(n)
  • n = O(n2)
  • log(n) = O(n)
  • 2 n + 1 = O(n)

The 'big-O' notation is not symmetric: n = O(n2) but n2 ≠ O(n).

Exercise. Let us prove n2 + 2 n + 1 = O(n2). We must find such c and n0 that n 2 + 2 n + 1 ≤ c*n2. Let n0=1, then for n ≥ 1

1 + 2 n + n2 ≤ n + 2 n + n2 ≤ n2 + 2 n2 + n 2 = 4 n2
Therefore, c = 4.

Constant Time: O(1)

An algorithm is said to run in constant time if it requires the same amount of time regardless of the input size. Examples:

  • array: accessing any element
  • fixed-size stack: push and pop methods
  • fixed-size queue: enqueue and dequeue methods

Linear Time: O(n)

An algorithm is said to run in linear time if its time execution is directly proportional to the input size, i.e. time grows linearly as input size increases. Examples:

  • array: linear search, traversing, find minimum
  • ArrayList: contains method
  • queue: contains method

Logarithmic Time: O(log n)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to the logarithm of the input size. Example:

  • binary search

Recall the 'twenty questions' game - the task is to guess the value of a hidden number in an interval. Each time you make a guess, you are told whether your guess iss too high or too low. Twenty questions game imploies a strategy that uses your guess number to halve the interval size. This is an example of the general problem-solving method known as binary search:

locate the element a in a sorted (in ascending order) array by first comparing a with the middle element and then (if they are not equal) dividing the array into two subarrays; if a is less than the middle element you repeat the whole procedure in the left subarray, otherwise - in the right subarray. The procedure repeats until a is found or subarray is a zero dimension.

Note, log(n) < n, when n→∞. Algorithms that run in O(log n) does not use the whole input.

Quadratic Time: O(n2)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to the square of the input size. Examples:

  • bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort

Definition of 'big Omega'

We need the notation for the lower bound. A capital omega Ω notation is used in this case. We say that f(n) = Ω(g(n)) when there exist constant c that f(n) ≥ c*g(n) for for all sufficiently large n. Examples
  • n = Ω(1)
  • n2 = Ω(n)
  • n2 = Ω(n log(n))
  • 2 n + 1 = O(n)

Definition of 'big Theta'

To measure the complexity of a particular algorithm, means to find the upper and lower bounds. A new notation is used in this case. We say that f(n) = Θ(g(n)) if and only f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = Ω(g(n)). Examples
  • 2 n = Θ(n)
  • n2 + 2 n + 1 = Θ( n2)

Analysis of Algorithms

The term analysis of algorithms is used to describe approaches to the study of the performance of algorithms. In this course we will perform the following types of analysis:
  • the worst-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by the maximum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the best-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by the minimum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the average case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by an average number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
  • the amortized runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by a sequence of operations applied to the input of size a and averaged over time.
Example. Let us consider an algorithm of sequential searching in an array.of size n.
Its worst-case runtime complexity is O(n)
Its best-case runtime complexity is O(1)
Its average case runtime complexity is O(n/2)=O(n)

Amortized Time Complexity

Consider a dynamic array stack. In this model push() will double up the array size if there is no enough space. Since copying arrays cannot be performed in constant time, we say that push is also cannot be done in constant time. In this section, we will show that push() takes amortized constant time.

Let us count the number of copying operations needed to do a sequence of pushes.

push()copyold array sizenew array size
1 0 1 -
2 1 1 2
3 2 2 4
4 0 4 -
5 4 4 8
6 0 8 -
7 0 8 -
8 0 8 -
9 8 8 16

We see that 3 pushes requires 2 + 1 = 3 copies.

We see that 5 pushes requires 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 copies.

We see that 9 pushes requires 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 15 copies.

In general, 2n+1 pushes requires 2n + 2n-1+ .. + 2 + 1 = 2n+1 - 1 copies.

Asymptotically speaking, the number of copies is about the same as the number of pushes.

We say that the algorithm runs at amortized constant time.

Victor S.Adamchik, CMU, 2009

Contents.Versions and key features FileVault was introduced with (10.3), and could only be applied to a user's home directory, not the startup volume. The uses an encrypted (a large single file) to present a volume for the home directory.

And use more modern which spread the data over 8 MB files (called bands) within a bundle. Apple refers to this original iteration of FileVault as legacy FileVault.(2011) and newer offer FileVault 2, which is a significant redesign.

This encrypts the entire OS X startup volume and typically includes the home directory, abandoning the disk image approach. For this approach to, authorised users' information is loaded from a separate non-encrypted boot volume (partition/slice type AppleBoot).FileVault The original version of FileVault was added in Mac OS X Panther to encrypt a user's home directory.Master passwords and recovery keys When FileVault is enabled the system invites the user to create a master password for the computer. Apple Press Info. June 23, 2003. Retrieved January 21, 2013. Configure l2tp vpn mikrotik. ScottW (November 5, 2007).

Archived from on October 29, 2013. Retrieved January 21, 2013. ^ Apple Inc (August 9, 2012).

Retrieved September 5, 2012. Apple Inc (August 17, 2012).

Archived from (PDF) on August 22, 2017. Retrieved September 5, 2012.

Apple support. Retrieved January 21, 2013.

CrashPlan PROe support. CrashPlan PROe. Retrieved January 21, 2013. CrashPlan support. Retrieved January 21, 2013., Ralf-Philipp Weinmann (December 29, 2006). Retrieved March 31, 2007. Cite journal requires journal=.; et al.

(February 2008). Archived from (PDF) on May 14, 2008. Cite journal requires journal=.

(PDF). ^ Apple, Inc (August 17, 2012). Archived from (PDF) on August 22, 2017.

Retrieved September 5, 2012. Dworkin, Morris (January 2010). NIST Special Publication (800–3E). Choudary, Omar; Felix Grobert; Joachim Metz (July 2012). Retrieved January 19, 2013.

Cite journal requires journal=. August 21, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2014.